tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6273491859992099948.post224438623199341534..comments2023-07-22T01:12:27.977+10:00Comments on CoffeeHouse Chess: Chess Victoria AGMCarlhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06976423420219689694noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6273491859992099948.post-21530721551026632242014-12-08T22:47:11.367+11:002014-12-08T22:47:11.367+11:00Thanks for that. Actually, I don't think my ve...Thanks for that. Actually, I don't think my version of events disputes the position that Paul and Dusan present, but it is good to hear things in their own words. This post was written before Dusan's post on chesschat , and I've talked to Paul about this issue before and I think we are pretty much in agreement.Carlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06976423420219689694noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6273491859992099948.post-84731617272060722892014-12-08T22:29:04.119+11:002014-12-08T22:29:04.119+11:00Though I agree wholeheartedly with your post's...Though I agree wholeheartedly with your post's sentiment, I think it only fair for your post to also include MCC and NPCC's side of the story. This is expressed in the posts by Paul Cavezza and Dusan Stojic in the relevant Chesschat thread:<br /><br />http://www.chesschat.org/showthread.php?15678-2014-Chess-Victoria-AGM<br /><br />You'll note that the version of events presented in the BHCC newsletter is refuted by one of Dusan's posts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com